Cryptocurrency Wallets Overview
Choosing a wallet depends on your needs. Below is an overview of popular solutions. This is an informational comparison—we do not promote or recommend any specific product.
| Wallet | Type | Networks | Open Source | Platforms |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MetaMask | Hot | EVM chains | Yes | Browser, Mobile |
| Trust Wallet | Hot | Multi-chain | Yes | Mobile |
| Ledger | Cold | Multi-chain | Partial | Hardware |
| Trezor | Cold | Multi-chain | Yes | Hardware |
| Phantom | Hot | Solana, EVM | No | Browser, Mobile |
| Tonkeeper | Hot | TON | Yes | Mobile |
Wallet Details
MetaMask
Type: Hot wallet (software)
Networks: Ethereum, Polygon, BSC, Avalanche, and other EVM-compatible chains.
Pros: Widely used, easy to set up, supports NFTs and DeFi.
Cons: Online storage, vulnerable to phishing if user is careless.
Best for: Regular traders, DeFi users, NFT collectors.
Trust Wallet
Type: Hot wallet (mobile)
Networks: Bitcoin, Ethereum, BNB Chain, Solana, and many others.
Pros: Multi-chain, built-in DEX, no custody of keys.
Cons: Mobile-only, requires secure device.
Best for: Mobile-first users, multi-chain holders.
Ledger
Type: Cold wallet (hardware)
Networks: Bitcoin, Ethereum, and 1000+ assets.
Pros: Offline storage, strong security, supports many coins.
Cons: Paid device, requires physical storage.
Best for: Long-term holders, large amounts.
Trezor
Type: Cold wallet (hardware)
Networks: Bitcoin, Ethereum, and multiple altcoins.
Pros: Open source, reputable, air-gapped signing.
Cons: Paid device, setup may be technical.
Best for: Security-focused users.
Phantom
Type: Hot wallet (software)
Networks: Solana, Ethereum.
Pros: Solana-native, NFT support, clean UI.
Cons: Closed source, Solana-focused.
Best for: Solana users.
Tonkeeper
Type: Hot wallet (mobile)
Networks: TON (The Open Network).
Pros: Native TON support, fast, Telegram integration.
Cons: TON-only.
Best for: TON and Telegram users.